| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
26
   |
Posted - 2013.07.04 17:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
He was clearly using null sec as an example. If you are going to reply, read the posts you are replying to first FFS.
This is why people want you to post with your main. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 17:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
WTF is Kid even talking about?
Nowhere did anyone say the WH space should be more like null or that everyone should be in massive alliances...
I'm all for more things to do in wormholes but I can only work with the tools CCP gave me and as I've been doing that for years now, I'd like a new tool now and again.
|
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 17:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Casirio wrote:
I guess I just feel that wanting to log in and shoot stuff is satisfying enough. dash in some epic battles, shiny ganks, merc ops, and general goofyness on late night comms and I'm a happy camper. grudges add a nice touch as well.
That's fair enough and I'm glad that you are 100% content with wormholes but not everyone feels that way. Personally I am not interested in kill boards. I like being motivated to fight for personal pride or the strength of the alliance. There is little pride to ganking people in sites all the time.
As an example, if there were some c5/6 wormholes with two statics and people fought over them, wouldn't that be a good thing?
People keep saying having blues are the problem - yeah no **** but the question is, how do we make it better to fight people that to be blue with them? |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
26
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 07:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Why post on a forum when you can just click you fingers and suddenly no one batphoes, flys T3 or blobs?
Seriously some of you seem to have missed the entire point of this thread. Put you pitchforks away and got read the first 3 pages again. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
29
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 17:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Please explain why a T3 nerf would fix anything. I'd predict the opposite , as the bigger alliances will just grow bigger so that they accomplish the same goals in the same time they did before the nerf.
Also why is bringing lots of people to a fight bad. If you can't handle it, you can always ask Mr kid if you can join his C2 corp. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
29
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 17:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
^ I smell weakness... Wormhole coalition - assemble! |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 08:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
It really is a shame this thread ended up this way. Lots of angry kids taking things out of context and trying to creat arguments.
Interesting topic but there are too many idiots aroud here for us to have a sensible debate as to whether wormholes could do with some new content.
OP I wouldn't waste your time, this has got way past the point where it should have been locked. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.06 08:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Then what is the point here because I'm lost...
On one side we hear "add content that; 1. Attracts more people to WH space 2. Gives a reason for the big guys to fight each other and 3. Gives us an alternative to POS bashing:
And on the other side we hear "it's all your fault, disband and move to a C2 or null" |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Confirming that killing supers in null drives conflict in wormhole space.
Actually...I just remembered. All the isk from our roams goes to the corp. With the corp isk at one point we supplied hundreds of ships to corp members for free and fully fitted. To go pew in wspace and null. So yes, killing supers in null drives conflict in wspace. Them free ships gotta be paid for somehow! I think at one point(when we cared), we were raking in so much isk off the modules of dead scrubs in null, we could buy an armour fleet fives times over a week.
Not really. The isk you get from your null sec roams came from killing null bears which doesn't effect wormholes and as you don't pvp exclusively in wormholes, you are not investing that isk in WH pvp.
I'm not saying looking for pvp in null is bad but it does little to create pvp opertunities in wormholes. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
That makes no sense... What are you asking?
Also, there are plenty of pvp opertunities in HS. Don't feel bad, sometimes wormholes forget wardecs are a thing. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
Huh?
I don't understand what point you are trying to make. Maybe you misread my post? Give it a second read mate. There is no need for a quick reply either, give yourself some time to think first. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
31
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 08:45:00 -
[12] - Quote
I'm sorry, are we talking about something other than the thread title now? What has HS got to do with increasing conflict between wormhole entities.
This thread and the idiots in it (maybe myself included) are the biggest wormhole conflict driver at the moment. 
Edit: ah you edited on me... Yeah maybe you are right. Perhaps C6 wormhole pvp should just be about killing PI alts and killing supers in null. |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 20:40:00 -
[13] - Quote
Robert Morningstar wrote:I would also add that all w-space is the best pi so that would replace the moon goo incentive, if you want to initiate pvp start knocking down custom offices.
Sounds good in theory but when you consider that POCOs are worth about the same a a single BC, it's not worth fielding a fleet for.
Do POCOs even drop loot? |
Quinn Corvez
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD
Polarized.
33
|
Posted - 2013.07.08 21:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
No need for personal insults here guys. |
| |
|